I'm going to talk about two pieces from the exhibition. One made me
think for a second, the other made me say in my head 'ahh, interesting'.
by Elin O'Hara Slavick
These [above] are flowers
It looked nicer in the exhibition space...the white bits looked more creamy
coloured, from the light, which appealed to me. Still though, doesn't matter,
once I'd found out what it was all about, the colour didn't matter anymore.
I thought it was just paint on canvas...but i was totally wrong. This is how
its done...
'the historic technique of laying objects
and natural forms onto paper impregnated with cyanide salts and exposing them
to sunlight'
its more photographic and has nothing to do with paint on canvas. The
technique, although serves a vital part in getting across O'Hara Slavick's point,
isn't (in my opinion) the main focus. It’s the items which are the most
significant. They are items which were left in the remains of the atomic bomb
dropped on Hiroshima and were borrowed from the "Peace Museum' in
Hiroshima.
Both the technique and the message compliment each other.
Next is the one which made me think for a second, its a moving image piece by
R. Luke DuBois called 'Kiss' here's the video...
he
reason why it made me think was because i didn't understand what sort of mood
it provoked in me, with a name like 'Kiss' and to find out its lots of classic
kiss scenes from films, I'd expect it to be quite warm and reminiscent...but
instead it had high energy and had a black background and a sound track which
made the whole thing really hard core. It made me think just how important
sound is to a piece and how it can change the mood.
Over all, the whole exhibition didn't appeal to me, with a lot of it going over
my head, yet saying this, as I've shown above, there were moments which did
either appeal to me or made me think.